Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
J Neurointerv Surg ; 14(9): 858-862, 2022 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1745670

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Data on the frequency and outcome of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for large vessel occlusion (LVO) in patients with COVID-19 is limited. Addressing this subject, we report our multicenter experience. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed of consecutive acute stroke patients with COVID-19 infection treated with MT at 26 tertiary care centers between January 2020 and November 2021. Baseline demographics, angiographic outcome and clinical outcome evaluated by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at discharge and 90 days were noted. RESULTS: We identified 111 out of 11 365 (1%) patients with acute or subsided COVID-19 infection who underwent MT due to LVO. Cardioembolic events were the most common etiology for LVO (38.7%). Median baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score and Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score were 16 (IQR 11.5-20) and 9 (IQR 7-10), respectively. Successful reperfusion (mTICI ≥2b) was achieved in 97/111 (87.4%) patients and 46/111 (41.4%) patients were reperfused completely. The procedure-related complication rate was 12.6% (14/111). Functional independence was achieved in 20/108 (18.5%) patients at discharge and 14/66 (21.2%) at 90 days follow-up. The in-hospital mortality rate was 30.6% (33/108). In the subgroup analysis, patients with severe acute COVID-19 infection requiring intubation had a mortality rate twice as high as patients with mild or moderate acute COVID-19 infection. Acute respiratory failure requiring ventilation and time interval from symptom onset to groin puncture were independent predictors for an unfavorable outcome in a logistic regression analysis. CONCLUSION: Our study showed a poor clinical outcome and high mortality, especially in patients with severe acute COVID-19 infection undergoing MT due to LVO.


Subject(s)
Brain Ischemia , COVID-19 , Ischemic Stroke , Stroke , Brain Ischemia/complications , Brain Ischemia/diagnostic imaging , Brain Ischemia/therapy , COVID-19/complications , Humans , Ischemic Stroke/diagnostic imaging , Ischemic Stroke/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Stroke/diagnostic imaging , Stroke/etiology , Stroke/surgery , Thrombectomy/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome
2.
Diagnostics (Basel) ; 12(3)2022 Mar 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1742363

ABSTRACT

Early grading of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), as well as ventilator support machines, are prime ways to help the world fight this virus and reduce the mortality rate. To reduce the burden on physicians, we developed an automatic Computer-Aided Diagnostic (CAD) system to grade COVID-19 from Computed Tomography (CT) images. This system segments the lung region from chest CT scans using an unsupervised approach based on an appearance model, followed by 3D rotation invariant Markov-Gibbs Random Field (MGRF)-based morphological constraints. This system analyzes the segmented lung and generates precise, analytical imaging markers by estimating the MGRF-based analytical potentials. Three Gibbs energy markers were extracted from each CT scan by tuning the MGRF parameters on each lesion separately. The latter were healthy/mild, moderate, and severe lesions. To represent these markers more reliably, a Cumulative Distribution Function (CDF) was generated, then statistical markers were extracted from it, namely, 10th through 90th CDF percentiles with 10% increments. Subsequently, the three extracted markers were combined together and fed into a backpropagation neural network to make the diagnosis. The developed system was assessed on 76 COVID-19-infected patients using two metrics, namely, accuracy and Kappa. In this paper, the proposed system was trained and tested by three approaches. In the first approach, the MGRF model was trained and tested on the lungs. This approach achieved 95.83% accuracy and 93.39% kappa. In the second approach, we trained the MGRF model on the lesions and tested it on the lungs. This approach achieved 91.67% accuracy and 86.67% kappa. Finally, we trained and tested the MGRF model on lesions. It achieved 100% accuracy and 100% kappa. The results reported in this paper show the ability of the developed system to accurately grade COVID-19 lesions compared to other machine learning classifiers, such as k-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), decision tree, naïve Bayes, and random forest.

3.
Sensors (Basel) ; 21(16)2021 Aug 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1355031

ABSTRACT

A new segmentation technique is introduced for delineating the lung region in 3D computed tomography (CT) images. To accurately model the distribution of Hounsfield scale values within both chest and lung regions, a new probabilistic model is developed that depends on a linear combination of Gaussian (LCG). Moreover, we modified the conventional expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm to be run in a sequential way to estimate both the dominant Gaussian components (one for the lung region and one for the chest region) and the subdominant Gaussian components, which are used to refine the final estimated joint density. To estimate the marginal density from the mixed density, a modified k-means clustering approach is employed to classify the Gaussian subdominant components to determine which components belong properly to a lung and which components belong to a chest. The initial segmentation, based on the LCG-model, is then refined by the imposition of 3D morphological constraints based on a 3D Markov-Gibbs random field (MGRF) with analytically estimated potentials. The proposed approach was tested on CT data from 32 coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients. Segmentation quality was quantitatively evaluated using four metrics: Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), overlap coefficient, 95th-percentile bidirectional Hausdorff distance (BHD), and absolute lung volume difference (ALVD), and it achieved 95.67±1.83%, 91.76±3.29%, 4.86±5.01, and 2.93±2.39, respectively. The reported results showed the capability of the proposed approach to accurately segment healthy lung tissues in addition to pathological lung tissues caused by COVID-19, outperforming four current, state-of-the-art deep learning-based lung segmentation approaches.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Algorithms , Humans , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted , Lung/diagnostic imaging , SARS-CoV-2 , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
4.
Sci Rep ; 11(1): 12095, 2021 06 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1262012

ABSTRACT

The primary goal of this manuscript is to develop a computer assisted diagnostic (CAD) system to assess pulmonary function and risk of mortality in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The CAD system processes chest X-ray data and provides accurate, objective imaging markers to assist in the determination of patients with a higher risk of death and thus are more likely to require mechanical ventilation and/or more intensive clinical care.To obtain an accurate stochastic model that has the ability to detect the severity of lung infection, we develop a second-order Markov-Gibbs random field (MGRF) invariant under rigid transformation (translation or rotation of the image) as well as scale (i.e., pixel size). The parameters of the MGRF model are learned automatically, given a training set of X-ray images with affected lung regions labeled. An X-ray input to the system undergoes pre-processing to correct for non-uniformity of illumination and to delimit the boundary of the lung, using either a fully-automated segmentation routine or manual delineation provided by the radiologist, prior to the diagnosis. The steps of the proposed methodology are: (i) estimate the Gibbs energy at several different radii to describe the inhomogeneity in lung infection; (ii) compute the cumulative distribution function (CDF) as a new representation to describe the local inhomogeneity in the infected region of lung; and (iii) input the CDFs to a new neural network-based fusion system to determine whether the severity of lung infection is low or high. This approach is tested on 200 clinical X-rays from 200 COVID-19 positive patients, 100 of whom died and 100 who recovered using multiple training/testing processes including leave-one-subject-out (LOSO), tenfold, fourfold, and twofold cross-validation tests. The Gibbs energy for lung pathology was estimated at three concentric rings of increasing radii. The accuracy and Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) of the system steadily improved as the radius increased. The overall CAD system combined the estimated Gibbs energy information from all radii and achieved a sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and DSC of 100%, 97% ± 3%, 98% ± 2%, and 98% ± 2%, respectively, by twofold cross validation. Alternative classification algorithms, including support vector machine, random forest, naive Bayes classifier, K-nearest neighbors, and decision trees all produced inferior results compared to the proposed neural network used in this CAD system. The experiments demonstrate the feasibility of the proposed system as a novel tool to objectively assess disease severity and predict mortality in COVID-19 patients. The proposed tool can assist physicians to determine which patients might require more intensive clinical care, such a mechanical respiratory support.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/diagnostic imaging , COVID-19/physiopathology , Lung/diagnostic imaging , Lung/physiopathology , Radiography, Thoracic , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Adult , Aged , Deep Learning , Female , Humans , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted , Male , Middle Aged , Stochastic Processes
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL